| Semester 2 Credit Value: | 10 |
|---|---|
| Semester 3 Credit Value: | 10 |
| ECTS Credits: | 10.0 |
This module, ‘Clinical Trials - E-learning’ (MCR8015), is part of the Clinical Research Programme and it is designed to expand upon principles of the design, conduct and analysis of clinical trials. Students will be introduced to the principles and practices of the design and conduct of trials of both pharmaceutical and complex interventions, assessing the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the trialled interventions. The module is designed to equip students with the skills required both to critically appraise all aspects of trials designed by others and to design and implement their own trials.
Practical aspects of trial design and conduct, including ‘marketing’ the trial, consumer involvement and engagement with clinical research networks, will also be considered. The module is designed to provide students with a firm basis for appraising existing and proposed trials, and for designing their own trials. The module will be delivered on e-learning via blackboard VLE. The curriculum will be delivered through a series of guided learning opportunities including e-based tutorials, lectures and discussion boards. Students will submit their work for assessment via Blackboard VLE and feedback given electronically.
The module covers the following subjects:
i. The drug development process, from bench to bedside
ii. Phase I to Phase IV drug trials, their purpose and design
iii. Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
iv. The role of NICE and other bodies in bringing drugs and technologies into routine clinical practice
v. Different trial designs (parallel group, cross-over, factorial designs, equivalence trials, non-inferiority trials etc) – their advantages and disadvantages
vi. Explanatory vs. pragmatic trials
vii. Statistical considerations in clinical trials (including sample size calculations)
viii. Economic evaluation alongside trials, including economic modelling
ix. Patient reported outcomes, their choice and application
x. Recruitment to studies
xi. The MRC framework for complex interventions
xii. The nature and role of pilot studies
xiii. ‘Marketing’ clinical trials
xiv. Consumer involvement in clinical and health-related research
xv. Costing a research study
xvi. The role of clinical research networks in supporting trials and other high quality clinical research
| Category | Activity | Number | Length | Student Hours | Academic Staff Contact Hours | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided Independent Study | Assessment preparation and completion | 60 | 1:00 | 60:00 | 10:00 | N/A |
| Guided Independent Study | Directed research and reading | 40 | 1:00 | 40:00 | 0:00 | N/A |
| Guided Independent Study | Skills practice | 25 | 1:00 | 25:00 | 0:00 | N/A |
| Guided Independent Study | Project work | 25 | 1:00 | 25:00 | 10:00 | Staff hours from Discussion Board |
| Guided Independent Study | Reflective learning activity | 25 | 1:00 | 25:00 | 0:00 | N/A |
| Guided Independent Study | Independent study | 25 | 1:00 | 25:00 | 0:00 | N/A |
| Total | 200:00 | 20:00 |
Students will be assessed through written work, comprising two critical reviews. The first of the two reviews will be a critical review of a grant application for a clinical research study. The second will be a critical review of a funding proposal which will include within it recommendations from a choice of measures and range of patient reported outcomes. This module will be delivered by e-learning using Blackboard VLE through a series of guided learning opportunities including e-based lectures or tutorials. Work will be submitted via Blackboard VLE for assessment.
| Description | Semester | When Set | Percentage | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Written exercise | 3 | M | 50 | Critical review and selection of patient reported outcome measure(s) for a specific study (1500 words). |
| Written exercise | 3 | M | 50 | Review of funding proposal for a cinical tial (1500 words). |
| Description | When Set | Percentage | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Written exercise | M | 50 | Critical review and selection of patient reported outcome measure(s) for a specific study (1500 words). |
| Written exercise | M | 50 | Review of funding proposal for a cinical tial (1500 words). |
A structured review (using the funding body’s peer review form) of a funding proposal for a clinical trial will require students to integrate their learning across this module including practical skills regarding drug trials and complex interventions and involvement of consumers and key stakeholders in research as well as key aspects of health economics (and indeed to draw on learning from other modules), and to comment on the scientific and practical aspects of the proposed study.
In the second written assignment, students will be presented with a specific study scenario and will be asked to identify and review candidate measures of patient reported outcomes, and to make a recommendation as to which measure(s) would be the most suitable for use in the specific study scenario.
Written communication, planning and organisation and information literacy are practiced and assessed in the critical review and selection of patient reported outcome measures and in the review of a funding proposal for a clinical trial. Interpersonal communication is practiced and assessed in a written format in both assessments. Clear communication is crucial in both of these written pieces. Computer skills are practiced through the use of Word and for accessing pertinent information for the two reviews for assessment. Adaptability, initiative, some numeracy and problem solving are practiced in the module and may be critical in the production of these two reviews also.
Disclaimer: The University will use all reasonable endeavours to deliver modules in accordance with the descriptions set out in this catalogue. Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information, however, the University reserves the right to introduce changes to the information given including the addition, withdrawal or restructuring of modules if it considers such action to be necessary.