The findings of a study by Newcastle University and the University of Strathclyde, published online in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, question the assumption that decline only happens among teens and is gender specific.
And there is no evidence to indicate that the decline is greater among girls than it is among boys, the results show.
Researchers say the prevailing view among policy makers and health professionals is that physical activity levels during childhood are adequate, but fall sharply during adolescence, and that the decline is significantly greater among girls.
But there is little hard evidence to back this up, and what research has been carried out in this area has mostly been done before the impact of new technologies would have been felt, the experts add.
Preventing decline of physical activity
She said: “Our study questions the concept of the adolescent girl as a priority for research and policy efforts in physical activity. Future research and public health policy should focus on preventing the decline in physical activity which begins in childhood, not adolescence, in both girls and boys.
“There needs to be an improved understanding of the determinants of the different physical activity patterns, including an understanding of the importance of biological and environmental influences.”
In a bid to quantify the timing of any changes, experts tracked the physical activity levels of a representative sample of around 400 children taking part in the Gateshead Millennium Cohort Study from 2006 to 2015.
Physical activity levels were measured when the children were seven, nine, 12 and 15, using a small lightweight portable monitor, worn for seven days at a time.
The monitor - known as an actigraph - recorded activity for 15 second intervals, and was removed only at night, and for bathing/swimming.
As an additional back-up, the families involved were asked to log when the devices were worn and removed each day.
Overall, the total volume of physical activity fell from the age of seven onwards in both boys and girls during this time, with declines no steeper during adolescence than in earlier childhood. But the decline was not uniform, the data showed.
Activity levels of boys and girls
Four distinct patterns emerged for the boys: low levels that slowly tailed off from the age of seven (3%); initially high but rapidly declining levels from the age of seven (17%); moderate levels that gradually tailed off from the age of seven (61%); and stable levels of moderate to vigorous physical activity throughout (19%).
There were three different patterns among the girls: low levels of physical activity to start with, which slowly declined from the age of seven (19%); moderate levels that gradually tailed off from the age of seven (62%); and high initial levels that fell sharply from the age of seven onwards (19%).
This is an observational study, so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, added to which, although representative of North East England, the study findings may not be applicable to other areas of the country, or other nations, say the researchers.
But they point out: “The present study found that 100% of boys and girls fitted into longitudinal trajectories which were inconsistent with the orthodox view that physical activity begins to decline at adolescence, declines much more rapidly at adolescence and/or declines much more rapidly in adolescent girls than boys.”
The research did not set out to examine the reasons behind the changes, but finding out why around one in five of the boys managed to maintain levels of moderate to vigorous physical activity throughout the study period might help to inform future policy and practice, they suggest.
But the findings indicate that a shift in research focus might be warranted, they say. “The study questions the concept of the adolescent girl as a priority for research and policy efforts in physical activity,” they point out.
“Future research and public health policy should focus on (A) preventing the decline in physical activity which begins in childhood, not adolescence, and (B) providing an improved understanding of the determinants of the different physical activity trajectories, including an understanding of the relative importance of biological and environmental influences,” they emphasise.
Timing of the decline in physical activity in childhood and adolescence: Gateshead Millennium Cohort Study.
Mohammed Abdulaziz Farooq, Kathryn N Parkinson, Ashley J Adamson, Mark S Pearce, Jessica K Reilly, Adrienne R Hughes, Xanne Janssen, Laura Basterfield, John J Reilly.
Senior politics lecturer Dr Alistair Clark, gives his expert opinion on why parliamentary politics is more important than ever.
published on: 29 June 2017
Writing for The Conversation, Professor Richard Davies discusses how research can drive guidelines, but argues it makes no sense to talk of fracking being entirely “safe”.
published on: 28 June 2017