The following brief definitions do not replace the formal University regulations.
Plagiarism is defined as the use of the work of others without acknowledgement. This covers not just using words, but also, for example, concepts, ideas, data, designs, images, computer programmes and music. Note in particular that it refers to ideas, not just to words, so even if you express someone else’s ideas in your own words, the source of the idea must still be acknowledged.
Good academic work is expected to draw on other sources, but these must be acknowledged. This enables others to see where the ideas you use have come from, which actually lends added authority to your work. It also allows readers to follow up these sources directly, if they wish. It involves being honest about what is your work and what is the work of others. Think how you would feel if someone used your work without acknowledging it. Furthermore students who plagiarise are gaining an unfair advantage over their honest colleagues.
On the other hand you don’t need to reference material which is common knowledge or facts widely available from a range of sources, although it is recommended that you always reference statistical data.
Collusion is defined as the submission by two or more students of the same or similar pieces of work (or parts of pieces of work) which are presented as the individual’s own solely authored work. This could arise from students working together to complete the work, or by one student allowing another to copy his/her work. Copying without the author’s permission is not collusion, but taking another student’s work without permission is theft and constitutes a disciplinary offence.
Apart from formal group work, any work you submit is expected to be your own. It is your degree and it is clearly dishonest to submit work which is not your own.
Students can of course help and support each other and this is to be encouraged. It is a question of knowing where to draw the line.
The following list provides examples of forms of co-operation with fellow students which are to be encouraged:
Schools may also sometimes provide exemplars of work to help students understand what is expected or to help them understand assessment.
To avoid collusion though, you should:
We generally use this term in relation to University examinations, you should not:
It is important that assessment is fair and that students are rewarded for their own achievement. Otherwise it is unfair on the overwhelming majority of honest students.
You are expected to be honest in submitting research results, which should not be falsified. This could happen through including fictitious or false data, or by suppressing results, perhaps because they don’t match prior expectations.
In universities we rely on researchers being totally honest about their results, otherwise their conclusions and any action taken in consequence of their findings will be flawed. How would you feel if one of the sources you were using had been dishonest about research results, when you are relying on them?
It is not allowed to submit the same piece of work for different assessments. Otherwise it may be possible for someone to gain double credit for the same piece of work and that is unfair and dishonest. Auto plagiarism is therefore when you have already submitted the work (or similar work) for an assessment at Newcastle or elsewhere.