|
Home |
BETWEEN FOLK AND POPULAR: THE LIMINAL SPACES
OF THE VERNACULAR CONFERENCE THEMES If it is
true that “the ethnographic Other is now fully plugged in, and the
ethnomusicologist is no longer the only person in the field with high-tech
equipment” (Lysloff and Gay, Jr.); that the differences between
world and traditional folk musicians have collapsed, and for many of them
“the local marketplace and the global market are at some level the
same” (Bohlman); then it is probably time (again) to think to what
extent, “on the level of scholarship – within cultural studies,
subcultural theory, ethnic studies, and ethnomusicology – the music
[still] features within grids of distinction and political position clearly
indebted to older discourses in folkloristics, anthropology and Romantic
Kulturkritik” (Middleton). In the light of this, how does ethnomusicology
consider new vernacular and post-vernacular musics? Is the difference
between folk and popular still valuable, or even necessary? It is probably
time (again) to question the extent to which ethnomusicological theory
is now responding to the always changing process of the “stratification
of [musical] codes, each one in a state of constant change and adaptation,
each one recognized and owned by several communities (or sub-communities)
with different degrees of competence, and sometimes in conflict with each
other” (Fabbri). There will be papers and panels on the following themes: - Ethnomusicological theories
and processes of categorization
|
|