From October 2008 to May 2012
Project Leader(s): Janice McLaughlin
Staff: Emma Clavering, Erica Haimes, Michael Wright
Sponsors: Economic and Social Research Council
What’s it like for children and their families to be referred for genetic investigation? An increasing number of children with physical and learning disabilities and apparent problems in their development are being seen by geneticists. Such investigations take considerable time, involving ‘watchful waiting’ and discussions with parents and others about family medical history, including the development of family trees and the sharing of family pictures. A significant percentage of children who go through this process will not receive a definitive diagnosis. This project will examine important questions around the interrelationships between paediatric genetics, symbols of family identity, and narratives of future life. What is the social significance of diagnostic encounters over time? What are the long term consequences of living with or without a diagnosis for children, their family as a whole and wider social networks? How is genetic information incorporated into kinship accounts?
This project explored these questions with families using ethnographic approaches, which drew out meaning from the perspective of participants. For this, the research team used longitudinal narrative interviews with parent/carers, children who have been seen by the service, and wider family members and friends; and non-participant observation in both clinical settings and a range of family contexts.
Embedded within ethnography is an emphasis on exploring depth and complexity in people’s relationships to their social and cultural world. Interviews were negotiated by the researcher with each participant, and a range of styles and tools were developed that were appropriate to each person depending on age, relationship, involvement and personal concerns. For example, with the children and young people journals were used so that they could sketch out their ideas in drawings or stories and explain them to us during interviews. The observations (both clinical and family-based) provided opportunities for the research team to consider a range of dynamics conveyed through, for example, overt and subtle interactions between all those present, and the influence of setting and environment.
The impact of such encounters is not always immediately obvious, and there may also be changes in understandings and available knowledge. Hence it was important that the research followed families both over a period of time, and looking back in retrospect at events over several years. The research team followed 26 families in total, some of whom were new referrals to a Genetics Service and others who had been seen some time in the past - whether they received a diagnosis or not. The research, then, has aimed to capture a range of experiences and understandings that will contribute to critical disability studies, the sociology of the family and social anthropology.
An international symposium from the project was held on 23rd and 24th February in the Great North Museum, Newcastle upon Tyne entitled Medical and Scientific Understandings of Childhood Difference: Framings, Representations and Imaginaries. Click here for the Symposium brochure
The symposium themes reflected on how new understandings and representations of children are being produced across various medical disciplines. For example, a range of studies are exploring the interrelationships between genetics, neural pathways, cell chemistry and the environment in shaping the development of children’s cognitive, emotional and physical capabilities. The focus of much of this work is on those children whose development, at whatever stage, is different from the norm and identifying the key factors in understanding that variation. The medical aims of developing such understandings are multiple, but include seeking ways to: remove the source of difference if possible (through Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis [PGD] for example); limit the degree of difference in development a child will experience (through early intervention in speech and language therapy or physical therapy for example); predict the future possibilities for a child (through attempting to improve the ability of genetics and other areas to be able to offer prognosis as well as diagnosis); and provide ‘better’ explanations to children and those around them for why they are different (which also feed into familial ‘negotiations’ with support services to recognise their child’s needs).
What the symposium sought to do was explore these medical developments in the context of campaigns and debates from different support groups and disability groups calling for a range of societal and healthcare responses for children with complex illness and impairment issues, some of which can be degenerative, and most of which raise significant dilemmas for quality of life in the present and in the future. We brought together leading academics across anthropology, sociology, philosophy and social policy from the US, New Zealand and the UK, alongside those involved in clinical practice and supporting families who have a child with complex health needs.
The Project Findings Report, which summarises the key themes to emerge from the study, is now available.
The fieldwork for the project has now come to an end. Finishing the fieldwork involved spending time with families to explore and summarise both their time in the project and the changes in their lives during their time with us. Drawing such work to an end is always an emotive process and we are forever grateful for the time and perspectives families share with us.
The main focus of our work now is moving ahead with the dissemination of the findings of the project, both to academic audiences and also to practitioners and families. Our network of contacts in the region and nationally is helping with this. Two journal articles have recently been published in Sociology of Health and Illness and New Genetics and Society and other papers are currently being written. We have also launched the Project Findings Report which summarises the key themes to emerge from the project. A paper copy of this can be requested by emailing Janice McLaughlin. The report was launched at a workshop for families and practitioners which we held in October this year. The workshop was supported by both Contact a Family and Unique. We are continuing to work with both organisations on further dissemination of the findings as well as producing other material that could be useful to other families being seen by genetic services.
We have also begun to present the work to practitioners in Genetic Services and at national conferences, for example the British Human Genetics Society conference earlier this year.
Finally (for now!) an International Symposium entitled 'Medical and Scientific Understandings of Childhood Difference: Framings, Representations and Imaginaries' is currently being planned for February 2012.
The fieldwork phase of this ESRC project is now well underway. The project focuses on families with children who are referred to paediatric genetics due to a range of problems which may have a genetic aspect. Using ethnographic approaches – combining observations of different social and clinical interactions with interviews done over time – we are working with a range of family members to see how the introduction of genetics as an explanation for the apparent difficulties their child has is affecting family relations and life. The focus this year has been to recruit families to the study and to build up an enabling research relationship with those joining us. This is an intensive period, one which is already leading us to reflect on the complex nature of the family lives we are being introduced to. Already important issues are emerging around the significance of existing family narratives of illness and difference, and notions of what can be inherited and how. We are also increasingly interested in the role of interpretations by clinicians and by family members of the physical features of the child, as they play an important role in establishing what genetic syndrome the child may have. The contrasting interpretations of the clinicians and family members frame such features as either evidence of genetic difference or as belonging and closeness to others in the family.
While the project is in its early days in terms of analysis, we are already linking in with researchers working in the area internationally via conference presentations. For example, we presented at the Society of Medical Anthropology conference at Yale in September, on a panel on paediatric genetics. This is intended as a starting point for an international network on the topic, bringing together research being undertaken in Britain, the United States, and New Zealand. In addition we also presented at the third Vital Politics Conference in London. Our first publication from the project will be a paper examining the ethical and methodological issues of involving children in research, which will be published in Child: Care, Health & Development in 2010.
Looking in to the future, the fieldwork will continue for over another year, while we increasingly build our understanding, with families, of the social, cultural and medical processes they are living through.
If you would like more information on this project, please contact Emma Clavering (email below).
|
Dr Emma Clavering
|
|
|
Professor Erica Haimes
|
|
|
Professor Janice McLaughlin
|
|