Skip to main content

Module

ARC1007 : Architectural Design 1.1

  • Offered for Year: 2022/23
  • Module Leader(s): Mrs Armelle Tardiveau
  • Lecturer: Mr Daniel Russell, Mr David McKenna, Miss Sarah Stead, Mr James Longfield, Dr Loes Veldpaus, Mr Daniel Mallo
  • Owning School: Architecture, Planning & Landscape
  • Teaching Location: Newcastle City Campus
Semesters
Semester 1 Credit Value: 20
Semester 2 Credit Value: 20
ECTS Credits: 20.0

Aims

Architectural Design 1 aims to introduce essential architectural design skills, informed by an appropriate level of cultural and technical understanding (C1), theories and histories of architecture (C2). In particular, the module aims to introduce the methodological base and the methods of investigation and preparation (C1, C7): the iterative design process – research, analysis, synthesis and evaluation enabling appropriate design decisions; and basic techniques of evaluation and communication using a range of skills – oral/ graphic/written/numerical, mainly manual but also digital. In this its special emphasis is to refine the visual (fine arts) skills gained earlier by a student to be used in architectural representation (C3).
Architectural Design 1 also aims to enable students to identify the impact architecture has on users by introducing to them brief development (C5), environmental aesthetics and architectural or urban design theories (C2, C5 , C4, C6), which inform students in design process and proposition. The architectural tradition is introduced by intensive precedent studies.
The course fosters the framing of a personal ethical basis for design decisions, with an emphasis on client/user needs and concern for the natural/built environment (C5, C6). The base for making decisions about structures is introduced along the increasing level of complexity in briefs (C8).

Outline Of Syllabus

The module includes a series of design projects that reveal the nature of architectural design as iterative, accumulative process, multivalent and complex. This overview sketches in a conceptual framework in order to explain the relevance of further teaching (C1, C3, C7). A series of projects then focus on: orthographic drawing, model making, interventions within specific contexts – urban and natural; the implications of detailed decisions about context, materials and construction; 3D manipulation of interior space and light to meet specific functional requirements; and a project demanding an appropriate design response to a site and to a set of specific activities as well as a considered response to a setting of strong visual, climatic and cultural and social character (C4, C5). The relevance of methods related to the fine arts is introduced especially via the conceptual translation techniques or means to record response to environment (C3).
A series of related analytical and design projects gradually develop basic architectural thinking, skill and knowledge. Each project is carefully focused to introduce new ways of thinking; a new skill, or limited range of skills; and to encompass a particular type of knowledge. The learning experience is cumulative – each project enables the next and the level of complexity builds towards application in a final, consolidating project.
Projects in this module form an introduction to the scope and definition of the subject. Initially, skills in graphic composition and analysis are introduced as a means of analysing and synthesising architectural order by using architectural design precedents in group work (C7.1). Projects of smaller or larger scale are designed to introduce the spatial relationships. The ability to make informed choices about scale and material of basic structural elements is linked with basic functional and ergonomic factors and to architectural theories and history (C1.2, C1.3, C2.3, C3, C5.1, C5.3, C6.1, C7.2, C8.1, C8.2). The sites span from green landscape to larger homogeneous (coherent) environments allowing implementing the theories of urban design or cityscape introduced in other modules. C4.1, C5.1, C5.3, C6.1, C6.3. The awareness of the impact of the chosen design method is discussed in peer assessments and self- assessment tasks (C1,C2, C3). The projects and workshops particularly explore design as a dialogue between qualities and quantities of different orders. Theories and approaches differ according to the specific learning outcome of each project.

Teaching Methods

Teaching Activities
Category Activity Number Length Student Hours Comment
Scheduled Learning And Teaching ActivitiesLecture201:0020:00Design lectures supporting the project briefs Mix of PIP and synchronous online
Scheduled Learning And Teaching ActivitiesSmall group teaching223:0066:00Design tutorials and Crit/review (Presenting work and attending other student's reviews) PIP
Scheduled Learning And Teaching ActivitiesWorkshops104:0040:00Skills building workshop (hand & orthographic drawing, model making, photography, digital rep) PIP
Guided Independent StudyProject work1262:00262:00Independent study inc. design project development, making portfolio, submission for final assessment
Scheduled Learning And Teaching ActivitiesFieldwork34:0012:00Site visits / City walks PIP
Total400:00
Jointly Taught With
Code Title
ARC1014Architectural Technology 1.2: Principles of Constructing Architecture
Teaching Rationale And Relationship

Design learning is focussed around a carefully orchestrated series of design projects that build in complexity and scale throughout the year.

Each design project is undertaken in response to a design ‘brief’ and the supporting teaching (studio tutorials) takes place on weekly studio days and encourages a process-driven and iterative approach to design that often leads to a variety of presentational outputs. Students are encouraged to learn ‘alongside’ and in discussion with their peers and, to-this end, whilst some individual teaching and assessment takes place, the majority is undertaken in small groups, in order to help build a studio culture.

Throughout each design project there is often a focus on analysing and responding to one or more of the following:
• Site – in order to promote contextual-driven awareness (including climate, materials, proximal buildings and features)
• Brief/Schedule of Accommodation – in order to promote programmatic awareness (including entry points, routes, activities, and zonings)
• Precedents – in order to promote research-based working and the development of architectural language ideas

A wide variety of teaching and learning methods are employed, in order that theoretical teaching and practical application best complement one another at appropriate stages throughout each project. These include:
• Design project ‘briefs’ (often used to define the design problems and needs)
• Research, surveying and analytical skills (often employed to help understand these needs more fully)
• Design theory and practice (including case-study) lectures, videos and workshops/discussions (often provide techniques and methodologies that can be used in the problem-solving process)
• Verbal, written and visual communication skills and techniques (used to explain the problem, process and solution to others)
• Reflective learning – through the production of a weekly reflective blog/vlog/journal (used to help identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to personal learning development)

Teaching delivery is distributed reasonably evenly between Scheduled Learning and Teaching, Structured Guided Learning and Guided Independent Study. The former provides regular weekly contact to facilitate the process-driven nature of design as well as some semester-long ‘structure’, with the weekly Signposting Talks/Q&A Sessions playing a key role in helping students both navigate the module and contextualise their learning within the wider programme.

Should the public health situation not allow for present in person teaching, the lectures will be delivered in an online synchronous mode with weekly live module talks and drop-ins. Group tutorials and project reviews will move to synchronous online delivery with the support of online design platform Miro. Fieldwork will follow public health restrictions.

Assessment Methods

The format of resits will be determined by the Board of Examiners

Other Assessment
Description Semester When Set Percentage Comment
Portfolio2A60Portfolio Review
Portfolio1A40Portfolio Review
Assessment Rationale And Relationship

Design projects are reviewed weekly and provisionally marked at the end of each project. Individual performance is discussed as the year progresses. Each project is evaluated against a set of criteria outlined in the project descriptions and marking descriptors for each project. The assessment criteria for each project commonly require an understanding of and an ability to apply:
• a particular body of knowledge (related to the project)
• a particular range of skills and techniques (introduced in the project)

Following each project assessment, students receive a set of written comments in relation to the declared criteria, together with a provisional mark. Further oral feedback is given by the project leader once the projects are complete to help students understand their feedback within the wider context of their peers performance. Throughout the semester students will be given assessment grades for individual projects (letter grade) indicating broad performance, allowing students to amend and develop workbased on feedback recieved before the portfolio assessment at ther end of each semester. Semester 1 accounts for 40% whilst semester 2 accounts for 60% of the overall mark.

IMPORTANT: PLEASE NOTE THAT STUDENTS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A PORTFOLIO AT THE END OF THE YEAR THAT INCLUDES ALL THE DESIGN PROJECTS.

Failure to submit the full portfolio will be considered as non-submission of the entire module. It is your duty to look after any documents, originals and models.
The final mark is provisional and subject to approval within the external examination process.

Reading Lists

Timetable